California hit with yet another commission lawsuit

Key Takeaways:

– A new commission lawsuit has been filed in U.S. District Court in Sacramento, alleging collusion among real estate industry players in California to inflate real estate agent commissions.
– The defendants in the lawsuit include MetroList Services, several Realtor associations, and various brokerages.
– MetroList, unlike other MLSs, is not exclusively owned or operated by Realtor associations affiliated with the National Association of Realtors (NAR).
– The lawsuit claims that the defendants participated in a conspiracy to restrain trade by requiring sellers to pay inflated commissions to buyer brokers.
– The plaintiffs are seeking class action status and are demanding damages and a permanent injunction against the defendants.
– Both eXp and Keller Williams, two of the defendants, are facing multiple copycat commission lawsuits.
– The spokesperson for eXp stated that the company is confident in its ability to defend itself and upholds fair and transparent practices compliant with the law.
– Keller Williams is focused on post-trial motions in a previous commission lawsuit and claims that there were serious errors in the trial.
– Defendants RE/MAX and Anywhere, along with Anywhere franchise Century 21 Select Real Estate, are part of settlement agreements in previous commission lawsuits.
– Some defendants did not provide a comment on the lawsuit.

HousingWire:

Real estate professionals in California are facing yet another commission lawsuit. Filed on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Sacramento by Willsim Latham, LLC., the copycat suit alleges that real estate industry players have colluded to artificially inflate real estate agent commissions.

The lawsuit names MetroList Services, the area’s MLS, Sacramento Association of Realtors, Placer County Association of Realtors, El Dorado County Association of Realtors, Lodi Association of Realtors, Yolo County Association of Realtors, Central Valley Association of Realtors, Amador County Association of Realtors, Nevada County Association of Realtors, and Sutter-Yuba Association of Realtors as defendants. Brokerages RE/MAX, Anywhere, Keller Williams, eXp World Holdings, NorCal Gold, Williams L. Lyon & Associates, Guide Real Estate, Paul M. Zagaris Real Estate, and Anywhere franchise Century 21 Select Real Estate, are also defendants in the lawsuit.

Unlike other MLSs, MetroList is not exclusively owned or operated by Realtor associations affiliated with the National Association of Realtors. Instead MetroList is owned and operated by local Realtor associations and California Real Estate Brokers, Inc.

Despite not being affiliated with NAR, MetroList adopted a rule similar to NAR’s Participation Rule, requiring listing agents to make a blanket offer of compensation to buyers’ brokers in order to list a property on the MLS.

“By agreeing to adopt, implement, and enforce the Anticompetitive Broker Rules, the Defendants participated in a conspiracy to restrain trade by requiring Class Members to pay the broker representing the buyer of their homes, and to pay inflated commissions,” the complaint states. “Defendants’ conspiracy inflated buyer broker commissions, which in turn inflated the total commissions paid by Class Members. Plaintiff and Class Members each incurred, on average, thousands of dollars in overcharges and damages due to Defendants’ conspiracy.”

The lawsuit is seeking class action status for all persons in the U.S. who paid a buyer broker commission in connection with the sale of residential real estate listed on MetroList MLS between Jan. 18, 2020, and the present.

The plaintiffs in the suit are demanding a jury trial, as well as damages and a permanent injunction that prevents the defendants from retiring that sellers pay the buyer broker.

Both eXp and Keller Williams now face several of these copycat commission lawsuits.

In an emailed statement, a spokesperson for eXp wrote that the firm has been tracking the initial Sitzer/Burnett suit for years and is confident in its ability to defend itself.

“We are committed to upholding fair and transparent practices compliant with law and we already have mechanisms and a plan in place that enables buyers and sellers to negotiate commissions,” the spokesperson wrote. “Our agile business model allows us to make adjustments seamlessly and effectively, no matter the jurisdiction.”

Over at Keller Williams, which was found liable for colluding to inflate agent commissions in the Sitzer/Burnett trial, Darryl Frost, a spokesperson for the firm said the company is focused on post-trial motions in the Sitzer/Burnett suit.

“There were serious errors in the Sitzer trial that was tried in Kansas City,” Frost wrote in an email. “Because of the disturbing verdict, many plaintiffs’ attorneys continue to file baseless copycat suits.” 

Defendants RE/MAX and Anywhere, as well as Anywhere franchise Century 21 Select Real Estate, are all part of settlement agreements in the Sitzer/Burnett, Moehrl and Nosalek commission suits, which has been preliminarily approved by the court.

The other defendants in the suit did not return a request for comment.

Source link

Property Chomp’s Take:

is a commonly used element in HTML that is used to divide or section off content on a web page. It is a versatile element that can be used for various purposes, such as grouping related elements together, creating columns or grids, or applying CSS styles to a specific section of content.

In the context of the article, the

element is not directly related to the subject matter, which is a commission lawsuit in the California real estate industry. However, it is mentioned in the article that MetroList, the area’s MLS, adopted a rule similar to the National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) Participation Rule, requiring listing agents to make a blanket offer of compensation to buyers’ brokers in order to list a property on the MLS. This information is relevant to the lawsuit, as it alleges that the defendants colluded to artificially inflate real estate agent commissions.

The use of the

element in this case highlights the role of technology and web development in the real estate industry. MLS platforms, like MetroList, play a crucial role in facilitating the buying and selling of properties by providing a centralized database for real estate listings. The adoption of rules, such as the one mentioned, can have a significant impact on the industry and the commissions paid by sellers.

The mention of

in the article serves as a reminder that even seemingly small details in web development can have legal and financial implications. It underscores the importance of transparency and fair practices in the real estate industry, as well as the need for ongoing scrutiny and regulation to prevent anticompetitive behavior.

Overall, while the

element itself may not be the main focus of the article, its mention highlights the interconnectedness of technology, web development, and the legal landscape in the real estate industry. It serves as a reminder that even seemingly mundane elements in web design can have far-reaching consequences.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *